Hear me; let me reveal my tale, and you will dash the cup from your lips.'" They did not hear the voice. So did Saul's companions hear a voice on the road to Damascus or not? by Rob Plummer | Jun 8, 2019 | Scripture Passage, Extended Exegetical Discussions, Grammar, Other Texts. These two chapters of Acts tell the story of Paul's meeting with Jesus on the road to Damascus but appear to be inconsistent: And the men which journeyed with him stood speechless, hearing a voice, but seeing no man. In Acts 9:7 Luke repeats the accounts of Pauls testimony. Q. Acts 9:7 No, they didn't hear the voice. On how this applies to Paul's encounter in Acts 9:5-7 outside Damascus where Paul's companions hear the voice but see "no man," see our article on "Jesus' Prophecy On Who Identified Himself to Paul as 'Jesus'". Answer: Heard a voice, but saw no one Scripture reports Paul's traveling companions heard the Lord Jesus Christ's voice, but they didn't see anything. . . How It All Ends How Does God Want To Impact Our Lives?. If you notice, I am not joined by Pastor Bill. Pauls traveling companions reported hearing Jesus voice (Acts 9:7) and seeing a bright light (Acts 22:9). share. 4. Pauls Third Missionary Journey - While Apollos was in Corinth, Paul traveled through the interior regions until he reached Ephesus, on the coast, where he found several believers. They did not hear the voice . report. ii. coutez Keeping Healthy Talk In A Sick World et quatre-vingt-dix-neuf plus d'pisodes de Discover The Book Ministries, gratuitement! The other passages are Acts 20:515; 21:118; 27:128:16. 3) How many times, in the book of Acts, does St. Paul mention the account of his conversion? A. Skeptics contend that Acts 9:7 and Acts 22:9 are contradictory. That is incorrect. Acts 22:9, KJV, And they that were with me saw indeed the light, and were afraid; but they heard not the voice of him that spake to me.. 19 san francisco, saturday, march 29, 1913. I feel you can hear the first changes in the 1970's. Export to EndNote; Export to RefWorks; Export to PPN_to_DA3; Save to List; Did Paul's Companions Hear the Voice? And those who were with me saw the light, to be sure, but did not understand the voice of the One who was speaking to me. (NASB) Saved in: Bibliographic Details; Published in: Review and expositor: Main Author: Ben Oliver, A. They heard a "the sound", but they did not hear the words addressed to Paul [1]. Acts 22.9 - "They heard not the voice (the actual words) of him that spake to me" (implied by the use of the accusative). Greek makes a distinction between hearing a sound as a noise .

Jubilees 22:16 And you also, my son, Jacob, remember my words, and keep the commandments of Abraham, your father. Aanmelden of installeren is niet nodig. '…The men who were traveling with him stood speechlessbecause they heard the voice but saw no one. by Rob Plummer | Jun 8, 2019 | Scripture Passage, Extended Exegetical Discussions, Grammar, Other Texts. Max is May's younger brother and is one of Ash's traveling companions throughout his journey in the Hoenn Region. Acts9:7 vs Acts22:9 - The Road-to-Damascus Testimony: Did Paul's companions hear the voice or not? All your content will be saved and you can seamlessly switch devices. Did you receive the Holy Spirit when you believed? he asked them. There is an apparent contradiction here: Luke says "hearing a voice," but Paul says, "They heard not the voice." He first appears as one of those - Q. Paul's conversion - did his companions hear a voice or not? While enroute, Paul and his companions suddenly saw a great light (v3). . They heard a sound but did not understand its meaning. Acts 26:14 Both verses are from the King James Version. . 18. This probably explains the difficulty involved in Acts 9:7 and 22:9. Your choice. (3) Pauls focus in our text is not on every aspect of Satans opposition to God and man, but on his war with the saints. The first approach claims that the word "hear" should be translated "understand" in Acts 22:9, meaning that although the men heard the voice, they did not hear (understand) the voice. 9 My companions saw the light, but they did not understand the voice of him who was speaking to me. According to Acts:26, the voice heard was "in the Hebrew language", which was of course understood by Paul, but hardly by his companions, as it was an obsolete language. In Acts 22:9, they heard a sound, but were not able to hear (understand) what was said. 30 And when Paul would have entered in unto the people, the disciples suffered him not.

KJV Acts 9:7 And the men which journeyed with him stood speechless, hearing a voice, but seeing no man. And the men which journeyed with him stood speechless, hearing a voice, but seeing no man. 2 It was Barnabas who took Mark to Syrian Antioch when he and Paul returned there after bringing a collection for the community in Jerusalem (Ac 12, 25). Acts.22:9 He wears a money-green-colored T-shirt with a white As a result, they were rendered speechless. But they heard not the voice.This at first sight seems inconsistent with the statement in Acts 9:7, "hearing the voice." (Acts 22:9, KJV) Did Paul's companions hear only the voice of Paul? Only Jesus can make us clean of sin and the practice of unrighteousness or fleshy behavior. Cite this; Email this; Print; Export Record. Paul had been blinded by the light, and his companions led him to Damascus where he had nothing by mouth for three days (v9). Acts 9:7 vs. Acts 22:9, Did Pauls Companions Hear or not Hear. Paul persecuted Christians under the legal structure of Judaism; as such, he was charged to arrest Jewish Christians, but had no authority over Gentile Christians. The Companions of Paul in Acts Glenn S Holland Allegheny College (18 March 2016) TheActs oftheApostles portrays the companions of Paul in different ways and in And that is the last we hear of Barnabas in Acts. Day of Pentecost. Meaning of Paul's Road to Damascus Story. Acts 22:9, KJV, And they that were with me saw indeed the light, and were afraid; but they heard not the voice of him that spake to me.. There you will be told all that you have been assigned to do.' In Acts 9:7, the Bible says, And the men which journeyed with him stood speechless, hearing a voice, but seeing no man. However, narrating the same experience, Paul the apostle stated: And they that were with me saw indeed the light, and were afraid; but they heard not the voice of Him that spake to me (Acts 22:9).. Some of the words used in the KJV have different meanings than they have today.

Aucune inscription ou installation ncessaire. Yes, but they could not understand what the voice was saying. The second narrative that contains a record of Pauls conversion follows a vicious attempt on the part of certain militant Hebrews in Jerusalem to lynch the apostle based upon the false charge that he had defiled the Jews temple (21:27ff). That is incorrect. Satan carries on his warfare on various fronts. In Acts 9:7 they heard the sound, but were not able to make out what was said. 8 And Saul arose from the earth; and when his eyes were opened, he saw no man: but they led him by the hand, and brought him into Damascus. ; but they did not . 3:16) Story 64. Acts 7:14; Genesis 46:26-27; Why did Stephen see Jesus standing, when Peter said he was seated in heaven? The description here given by St. Luke seems to be contradictory in two particulars to St. Paul's own account in Acts 22:9and Acts 26:14. For St. Paul's companions are said here to have "stood speechless;" but in Acts 26:14they were "all fallen to the earth." Here they "hear the voice," but in Acts 22:9they "heard not the voice of him that spake." He worked a wide variety of jobsincluding TV cameraman, radio commentator, oyster diver, jungle survival instructor, lay analyst, creative writing teacher, reporter and editor of several West Coast newspapersbefore becoming a full-time Paul says that his travelling companions did not hear the voice of Jesus who spoke to him (Acts 22:19), whereas Luke says they heard the sound (Acts 9:7).

Yes, they heard the voice. The account in 9:3 indicates that the companions heard a voice, but the account in 22:9 clarifies that only Paul understood the words spoken by the voice. 4) Did St. Pauls companions hear the voice on the Damascus road? In Acts 22:9 the words "did not understand the voice" means that they did not understand the words which Paul heard. Acts 9:7; 22:9; Should we call the seven appointed men in Jerusalem "deacons"? Luke tells us of the men hearing a voice but, "seeing no man." 'The former denotes the sensational perception, the latter (the accusative case) the thing perceived' (Cramer)" - Vine on "hear."] And the man in whom the evil No. The third was Pauls Latin name, Paullus. If the translation is correct, then Luke has made a mistake. 17. Heres Dr. Ehrmans first alleged contradiction: On three occasions Acts narrates the conversion of Paul on the road to Damascus chapters 9, 22, and 26. As a case study in differing views of biblical inerrancy, this paper examines the often-cited apparent discrepancy between Acts 9:7 and 22:9 as to whether Paul's companions heard the voice of Jesus Christ as he spoke to him on the Damascus road. John Mark He is first introduced in Acts 22:9, KJV, And they that were with me saw indeed the light, and were afraid; but they heard not the voice of him that spake to me. Acts 22:9, NASB, And those who were with me beheld the light, to be sure, but did not understand the voice of the One who was speaking to me. He is currently on sabbatical taking a break. save. 1 comment. Acts 22:9 (KJV - see also ESV) And they that were with me saw indeed the light, and were afraid; but they heard not the voice of him that spake to me. How to Spot a False Teacher. The former indicates a hearing of the sound, the latter indicates the meaning or message of the voice (this they did not hear). On the road to Damascus, did Pauls traveling companions hear the voice that spoke to Paul? In Acts 9:7, the language is much different. . The first more recent CD where I thought you could hear a lot of deterioration is the Kisses On The Bottom CD. 31 Even some of the officials of the province, friends of Paul, sent him a message begging him not to venture into the theater. A. Why does Acts 9:7 say that those traveling with Paul heard Whereas Acts 9:7 states that Paul's travelling companions heard the voice, Acts 22:9 states that they did not. While Jesus appearance to Paul may have been different in character from Christs pre-ascension appearances, this encounter with Paul was no merely subjective vision, as both Jesus voice (Acts 9:7) and the bright light (Acts 22:9) were perceived by Pauls traveling companions. On the road to Damascus, did Pauls traveling companions hear the voice that spoke to Paul? x.-no. In Acts 22:9, it is said, "They which were with me (Paul) saw indeed the light, and were afraid, but they heard not the voice of him that spake to me." 30 Paul wanted to appear before the crowd, but the disciples would not let him. Saul of Tarsus (more commonly known by his legal Roman name, Paul) was a Pharisee who persecuted followers of Jesus Christ (who were known for awhile []. the sound of the voice), but not the actual words (implied by the use of the genitive). Export to RIS (Citavi, Zotero, etc.)

Paul heard a voice as Jesus communicated directly with him. The men with Paul heard the voice speaking to Paul but, to them, it was just an unintelligible sound. Did they hear the voice? A. They did not hear the voice. When Paul was converted/called on the Damascus Road, he had traveling companions with him. It is moving to hear Paul say that the three Jews had been a comfort, or a great encouragement, to him. Anti-Stratfordiansa collective term for adherents of the various alternative-authorship theoriesbelieve that Shakespeare of Stratford was a front to shield the identity of the real author or authors, who for He has short, black hair and brown eyes, much like his father. They heard the voice of Paul but not the voice of the Lord. The elders of the church. In heard the sound, the Greek word for "voice" () is also used Matthew 24:3 and 1 Thessalonians 4:16. hide. 31 And certain of the chief of Asia, which were his friends, sent unto him, desiring him that he would not adventure God gave Paul more than he could handle (2 Corinthians 1:8-11)Paul and his companions suffered such extreme pressure during a particular situation in When Paul tells the story in Acts 22:9, he says, And they that were with me saw indeed the light and were afraid, but they heard not the voice of him that spoke to me. In the second telling by Paul in Acts 26, he does not mention the other witnesses. Acts 9:7 states that Pauls companions hear the voice ( with the genitive); Acts 22:9 says they did not hear the voice ( with the accusative). As Saul (whose name by that time had been changed to Paul) gave his defense before the Jewish mob, he mentioned that those who were with me indeed saw the light but they did not hear the voice of Him who spoke to me (22:9, emp. There are two approaches that defenders of the bible have used in an attempt to clear up this discrepancy. Acts 9.7 - "Hearing a voice (i.e. . "They were dazzled and amazed at the sudden brightness. .. According to Acts, Paul says that when Jesus appeared to him he was traveling to Damascus with a group of companions; Jesus spoke to Paul andwhile not necessarily understanding the wordsthey all heard the voice. .

And do not become associates of theirs. The third account in Acts 26 tells us that Paul heard the voice speaking to him in Aramaic, not Greek, the common language in the Roman Empire in the first century. In view of the efforts made by people to hear Solomons wisdom, what should be our attitude toward the study of Gods Word? We are told by St. Paul himself (Acts 22:9) that they did nothear the voice. What is meant is clearly that they did not hear the wordscould attach no meaning to the sounds which for Saul himself had so profound a significance. So, in like manner, they saw the light, but did not see the form. Separate yourself from the Gentiles, and do not eat with them, and do not perform deeds like theirs. We have a new and better covenant that is not guided or ruled over by the traditions of man. The man that cannot be seen but whose voice can be heard is Paul. QUESTION. Luister gratis naar How It All Ends How Does God Want To Impact Our Lives? Since 26:14 specifies that the voice spoke in the Hebrew (or Aramaic) language, one wonders if Pauls companions were Hellenists who lacked fluency in the language that Jesus spoke. Tolstoy Criticizes Paulinism (html)(July 16, 2010) Acts 7:59; Did Paul's companions hear the voice or not hear the voice of the Lord on the road to Damascus?

Hello and welcome, to season 3 episode 82 of the Berean Manifesto faith hope and love for the modern Christian I'm Pastor Newms. Others heard the voice, but did not understand what it said. In mark, how does Jesus answer "Are You the Messiah?" Solomon Builds the Temple. Pauls third named companion is to remain in Rome, but sends his greetings: Aristarchussaluteth you (the word in the Greek means embraces you). There are several indications that while Paul's companions could not see anything but the dazzling light, Paul saw Jesus Himself: Acts 9:7 - the companions saw nothing but dazzling light; This same verse suggests that while the companions did not see anyone, it also is worded in a way that suggests that Paul did see someone. And there were seven sons of one Sceva, a Jew, and chief of the priests, which did so. Acts 9:7 vs. Acts 22:9, Did Pauls Companions Hear or not Hear. Paul's conversion: it seems tangible that only Paul heard the voice of God, but why didn't Paul's companions go blind as well at the sight of the bright light? Born in Tarsus, he was appointed Bishop of Tarsus by the Apostle TheActs oftheApostles portrays the companions of Paul in different ways and in greater or lesser detail. There are several possible explanations. Your specific belief about the correctness of the Bible or its original sources may limit you to a certain Acts 9:7 (KJV) And the men which journeyed with him stood speechless, hearing a voice, but seeing no man. Saul's travel companions audibly heard a voice (Acts 9:7) but did not comprehend it (Acts 22:9), so both accounts are correct. When the Lord spoke aloud to Paul, the companions heard the sound of the Lords voice but did not hear the voice of the Lord. Recall that the KJV was translated in 1611 and updated in 1769. The Shakespeare authorship question is the argument that someone other than William Shakespeare of Stratford-upon-Avon wrote the works attributed to him. Atheist activist Dan Barker has criticised this as unjustifiable. Acts 7:55-56; 2:34; Did Stephen address Jesus in prayer? Speak your mind, but mind what you post. According to the Bible, Paul not only heard Jesus Christ, but he also saw Jesus Christ on the road to Damascus (not including other times). Peter Culbert Author has 96 answers and 10.4K answer views 2 y (Acts 9:7;22:9) My companions led me by the hand into Damascus, because the brilliance of the light had blinded me. Since Paul was a Roman citizen, he would have been given three names at birth. . 3 As he was traveling, it happened that he was approaching Damascus, and suddenly a light from heaven flashed around him; 4 and he fell to the ground and heard a voice saying to him, Saul, Saul, why are you persecuting Me? 7 The men who traveled with him stood speechless, hearing the voice but seeing no one. When Paul heard the heavenly voice on the road to Damascus (Acts 9:7; 22:9), his companions heard the sound of a voice, but they did not hear articulate words. Frank Herbert is the bestselling author of the Dune saga. The men did not hear God speaking to Paul and did not hear what God said to Paul. Therefore, as we put the two statements together, we find that Pauls companions heard the Voice as a sound . Paul also says that he and his companions all fell to the ground (Acts 26:14), whereas Luke says that Saul fell to the ground and his companions stood speechless (Acts 9:7). The paper Read more The voice then told him what to do (v6). Scholars debate whether Luke may not have used the first person plural hear the message that it articulated. Paul's Traveling Companions. The companions heard the voice (Pauls voice) but did not see anyone. What Did John Hear? The people seized Gaius and Aristarchus, Pauls traveling companions from Macedonia, and all of them rushed into the theater together. He was born in Tacoma, Washington, and educated at the University of Washington, Seattle. "Buster" Dobbs; DIFFICULT PASSAGES: Why did Paul shave his head and make a vow? Max is a small young boy. Paul's companions on the road to Damascus heard Jesus' voice but evidently did not understand His words. 7 The men traveling with Saul stood there speechless; they heard the sound but did not see anyone. And they that were with me saw indeed the light, and were afraid; but they heard not the voice of him that spake to me. tw m san francisco public library san francisco public library 3 1223 03475 3625 reference book not to be taken from the library ireman vol. These examples illustrate how confusion can arise in the comparison of Acts 9 with Acts 22. Paul heard a voice as Jesus communicated directly with him. The men with Paul heard the voice speaking to Paul but, to them, it was just an unintelligible sound. Did they hear the voice? Yes, in the sense that they heard something. While in Miletus, who was in Ephesus that Paul wanted to hear from ? One is Nymphas, about whom we know nothing, apart from the fact that a congregation somewhere met in his house. According to the Bible, Paul not only heard Jesus Christ, but he also saw Jesus Christ on the road to Damascus (not including other times). This can add to the interpretation that they heard a sound, but did not understand it. Yes, they heard the voice. These words are meant to build up, edify and strengthen the church. . We can read the word daily, fast and pray. Beheld indeed the light [and were afraid, A.V. How It Similar Items. Having named seven worthy companions, plus Demas, Paul has a greeting and a word for two people in the churches of Colosse and Laodicea. Paul's Contradictions of Jesus (html)(July 14, 2010) 16. Paul, of course, was known as Saul, at the time of the Here they "hear the voice," but in Acts 22:9 they "heard not the voice of him that spake." Acts 22:9, NIV, My companions saw the light, but they did not understand the voice of him who was speaking to me. This is an interesting difficulty to tackle. Acts 9:7, NIV, The men traveling with Saul stood there speechless; they heard the sound but did not see anyone.. KJV Acts 22:9 And they that were with me saw indeed the light, and were afraid; but they heard not the voice of him that spake to me. On the next day we who were Pauls companions departed and came to Caesarea, dreams, visions, the still small voice of the Holy Spirit, and more (Check out more ways to hear God). Barnabas Barnabas is the chief companion of Paul in Acts. Finishing Hopefully in a Despairing World. Acts 22:9, NASB, And those who were with me beheld the light, to be sure, but did not understand the voice of the One who was speaking to me. Acts 22:9, KJV, And they that were with me saw indeed the light, and were afraid; but they heard not the voice of him that spake to me. Acts 7:59; Did Paul's companions hear the voice or not hear the voice of the Lord on the road to Damascus? The other is Archippus (called a fellow soldier in Philemon ). added). Beginning with verse 13 of chapter 26 we read Pauls account: About noon, O king, as I was on the road, I saw a light from heaven, brighter than the sun, blazing around me and my companions. Does the Bible contradict itself on this point? Paul and nine companions headed east.

the Lord, and his stunned companions only heard the voice of Paul.

I asked. . Mt10:35 vs 1Tim3:4 - Holy divisions among family members: When the Lord sets a man a variance against his son, does that disqualify him from being a and hearing a voice as a thought-conveying message. Paul said, " You know, from the fist day that I came to Asia, in what manner I always lived among you, serving the Lord with all _______, with many ______ and trails which happened to me by plotting of the Jews." Yes, but they could not understand what the voice was saying. by: Witetschek, Stephan Published: (2014) "We did not hear the bagpipe": a note on Daniel 3 by: Deventer, Hans J. M. van Published: (1998) ; To Hear the Master's Voice: Revelation and Spiritual Discernment in the Call of Samuel by: Moberly, Walter 1952- Published: (1995) A contradiction in the details of the account of Paul's revelatory vision given in Acts has been the subject of some debate. Acts 6:1-6 by Byron Denman; Fellowship In Acts by H.A. "'What shall I do, Lord?' 3 This became a reason for the conflict between Paul and Barnabas, because Paul would no longer accept Mark as a Archippus. It may well be that the shout/voice/trumpet sound that accompanies the rapture will have the same effect. * [16:1017] This is the first of the so-called we-sections in Acts, where Luke writes as one of Pauls companions. The incident is the experience of Paul in seeing the light and hearing the voice on the road to Damascus. The first is a narration from a third party reporting what happened Acts 9. While in Acts 22 Paul was giving his own encounter about what he saw an On the road to Damascus, did Pauls traveling companions hear the voice that spoke to Paul? . 2) Then he fell to the ground, and heard a voice saying to him Saul, Saul, why are you persecuting me? what truth does this verse reveal? 13 Now when some days had passed, Agrippa the king and Bernice arrived at Caesarea and greeted Festus. [In this account, Pauls companions here a voice, but see no one.] In Paul's day the purification process was guided by an outdated or old covenant with men's traditions mixed in. Did they hear or not hear the Lord speak to Paul? Paul alone heard it intelligibly. Like when he remade some Beatles songs then (different things on youtube) or did old standards, you can hear the "Macca" voice starting to develop.

The Idea in Brief The Greek verb means to hear and/or to understand. Discussion In the Greek New Testament, the verb means to hear Since he is underaged to be a Pokmon trainer, he frequently just befriends Pokmon without actually owning any of them. ].This corresponds with the statement in Acts 9:7, that the men who journeyed with Saul "stood speechless. It is possible that God purposefully enabled Paul to understand the voice, and confused the hearing of the others there because the message was for Paul alone. 100% Upvoted. (Acts 9:7, KJV) And they that were with me saw indeed the light, and were afraid; but they heard not the voice of him that spake to me. Did they hear or not hear the Lord speak to Paul?

"'Get up,' the Lord said, 'and go into Damascus. The root Greek word translated "hearing" in Acts 9:7 and "hear" in Acts 22:9 is (akouo), which means "to hear" in the audible sense but also "to hear" in the sense of comprehending or understanding. (We can assume that Paul, the primary source, is more trustworthy.) Acts 9:7, NIV, The men traveling with Saul stood there speechless; they heard the sound but did not see anyone.. We all fell to the ground and I heard a voice saying to me They divided themselves into four bands in the hope of canvassing the whole country with the Gospel. When Paul was converted/called on the Damascus Road, he had traveling companions with him. 4:29, 34; John 17:3; 2 Tim. For St. Paul's companions are said here to have "stood speechless;" but in Acts 26:14 they were "all fallen to the earth." . The portrayal of his companions contributes to a particular presentation of Paul as the figure that comes to dominate the second half of the book. 7 And the men which journeyed with him stood speechless, hearing a voice, but seeing no man. This most certainly appears to me to be a contradiction, did they "hear a voice" or did they "hear not a voice". My companions saw the light, but they did not understand the voice of him who was speaking to me. Then certain of the vagabond Jews, exorcists, took upon them to call over them which had evil spirits the name of the Lord Jesus, saying, We adjure you by Jesus whom Paul preacheth. And the evil spirit answered and said, Jesus I know, and Paul I know; but who are ye? Let's not spread misinformation. (1 Ki. Taking Paul as their leader in this endeavor, the men all agreed to participate. They did not hear the voice . What did a voice say from the burning bush, and whose voice was it? In this place, the words "heard not the voice" must be understood in the sense of "understanding the words," of hearing the address, the distinct articulation, which Paul heard. By translating 9:7 as "they heard the sound" instead of "they heard the voice," the NIV allows for Paul's companions to have heard an audible sound in Acts 9:7 without contradicting the statement in Acts 22:9 that they did not hear a comprehensible voice. Acts 22:9 specifically states that the companions did not hear the voice of the one who was speaking to Paul. (Victor Frankenstein) 8 answers. met 299 afleveringen van de Discover The Book Ministries! No, they replied, we havent even heard that there is a Holy Spirit. Then what baptism did you experience? he asked. Pauls Latin name was a 29 And the whole city was filled with confusion: and having caught Gaius and Aristarchus, men of Macedonia, Paul's companions in travel, they rushed with one accord into the theatre. Acts 9:7; 22:9; Should we call the seven appointed men in Jerusalem "deacons"? That's a good question. Paul's blindness illustrates Christ's teachings on spiritual blindness .